Last updated on March 24, 2020
“Being the original petitioner on whose PIL the whole constitutional revamp happened, I have decided to file a plea that apex court should let Sourav Ganguly and his team (secretary Jay Shah in this case) continue for a term of three years,” Verma instructed PTI on Monday.
As per the brand new BCCI structure primarily based on justice RM Lodha committee’s reforms, any one who has been an workplace bearer in state in addition to BCCI for consecutive period of six years may have to go for obligatory cooling off period of three years.
In case of Ganguly, a former Cricket Association of Bengal joint secretary and later president, who took over in October, he had roughly 9 months within the BCCI workplace.
Ditto for Shah, who has been the secretary of Gujarat Cricket Association for 5 plus years, and also will have to go into obligatory cooling off.
So why does Verma need to file one other petition?
“My entire intention was to ensure BCCI has a transparent functioning. If a person of Sourav’s stature can’t complete his term, then what’s the use?”
The second purpose in accordance to Verma is continuity.
“The BCCI had been completely mismanaged by the Committee of Administrators (CoA) for nearly three years. Any person coming in charge needs time to put a system in place. Ganguly and his team must be given that time,” Verma mentioned.
“If you look at the current scenario. There is a complete lockdown in the country due to COVID-19 pandemic. Supposedly we lose two months of activity, it is unfair on both Ganguly and Shah that they are not given a fair chance to set the house in order. That will be my plea,” Verma mentioned.